On 2013-12-13 10:30:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2013-12-13 09:52:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I think you're probably right: > >> what should be in the interrupt handler is something like > >> "if (ImmediateInterruptOK) CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();" > > > Yea, that sounds right. Or just don't set process interrupts there, it > > doesn't seem to be required for correctness? > > It is if we need to break out of a wait-for-lock ...
Right, that uses MyProc->sem and not MyProc->procLatch... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
