On 2013-12-19 09:16:59 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> There's no uint32 type at the SQL level, and int32 is no good because
> it can't represent sufficiently large positive values to cover the
> largest possible block number.
Well, pg_class.relpages is an int32, so I think that limit is already
kind of there, even though BlockNumber is typedef'ed to uint32. Yes, we
should rectify that sometime.
Even so, I don't see a reason not to use int64 here, before that.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: