Robert Haas escribió: > I think it may have been a mistake to divide responsibility between > the prepare and execute functions the way we did in this case, because > it doesn't appear to be a clean separation of concerns. But it's not > this patch's job to kibitz that decision, so this version just fits in > with the way things are already being done there.
If you want to change how it works, feel free to propose a patch; I'm not in love with what we're doing, honestly, and I did propose the idea of using some flag bits instead of the whole mask, but didn't get any traction. (Not that that thread had a lot of participants.) Or are you suggesting that I should do it? I would have welcomed feedback when I was on that, but I have moved on to other things now, and I don't want to be a blocker for the forensic freeze patch. Anyway I think if we want to change it, the time is now, before we release 9.3.3. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
