Joel Jacobson <j...@trustly.com> wrote: > As reported by Andrey Karpov in his article > http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0227/ > the version number is expressed in octal form 070100 should be > changed to 70100. > > Attached patch fixes the reported issue.
This is a bug, but it's not clear what the correct patch should be. If you look at our docs: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/app-pgdump.html#PG-DUMP-NOTES It says, "(Currently, servers back to version 7.0 are supported.)" The source code seems to be trying to support back to 7.1.0, but because of the leading zero making it an octal literal it is taken as version 2.87.36. Do we want to make the code match the docs, or make both match what the code appears to have been attempting? -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
