From: "Peter Eisentraut" <pete...@gmx.net>
On 12/25/13, 6:40 AM, MauMau wrote:
pg_regress must wait for postgres to terminate by calling waitpid(),
because it invoked postgres directly. The attached
pg_regress_pg_stop.patch does this. If you like the combination of this
and the original fix for pg_ctl in one patch, please use
This patch doesn't apply.
Is that true? Today, I downloaded the following file (whose timestamp was
2014-Jan-04), and could apply pg_stop_fail_v3.patch cleanly. The "make
Could you confirm again and tell me what problem is happening?
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: