On 01/08/2014 03:18 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > Do you really feel that a WARNING and increasing the docs to point > out that three systems are necessary, particularly under the 'high > availability' documentation and options, is a bad idea? I fail to see > how that does anything but clarify the use-case for our users.
I think the warning is dumb, and that the suggested documentation change is insufficient. If we're going to clarify things, then we need to have a full-on several-page doc showing several examples of different sync rep configurations and explaining their tradeoffs (including the different sync modes and per-transaction sync). Anything short of that is just going to muddy the waters further. Mind you, someone needs to take a machete to the HA section of the docs anyway. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
