Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes:
> On 01/09/2014 10:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Don't we want to archive both? If you want to recover to the end of the
>> old timeline, you're going to need that file too, no?
> Hmm. It should be the responsibility of the original server to archive
> the segment on the old timeline.
Oh ... I was thinking about the case of a timeline switch within one
server, say as a result of PITR recovery. If you're sure this same case
doesn't come up that way, then nevermind.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
