On 9 January 2014 15:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes:
>> My first thought was that it should just preprocess any security
>> barrier quals in subquery_planner() in the same way as other quals are
>> preprocessed. But thinking about it further, those quals are destined
>> to become the quals of subqueries in the range table, so we don't
>> actually want to preprocess them at that stage --- that will happen
>> later when the new subquery is planned by recursion back into
>> subquery_planner(). So I think the right answer is to make
>> adjust_appendrel_attrs() handle recursion into sublink subqueries.
> TBH, this sounds like doubling down on a wrong design choice.
Perhaps, but it's a design choice informed by all the problems that
arose from the previous attempts.
Right now I don't have any other ideas how to tackle this, so perhaps
continued testing to find where this falls down will inform a better
approach. If nothing else, we're collecting a useful set of test cases
that the final patch will need to pass.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: