Gavin Flower <gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote:
> Starting arrays at zero makes the most sense, as then you can
> calculate the displacement simply as (index) * (size of entry),
> and not have subtract one from the index first. This would be my
The SQL standard explicitly specifies that arrays positions range
from 1 to the cardinality of the array, with individual elements
referenced by position. When implementing a language for which
there is an international standard, my preference is to conform to
I don't have a problem with extensions to the language, and a
variable low bound is workable as an extension as long as the
standard ways to create an array default to a low bound of 1.
A bigger problem with our array implementation is that is is really
a multidimensional matrix, rather than an array which can contain
nested arrays. That is both non-standard and limiting.
That said, I think it would be nice to have better support for
arrays defined with a single dimension and a low bound of 1, as the
standard requires. Functions which throw an error when passed a
non-conforming parameter and can provide a simplified API as a
result would probably get used by me.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: