On 01/10/2014 04:25 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
Adrian,


* Adrian Klaver (adrian.kla...@gmail.com) wrote:
A) Change the existing sync mode to allow the master and standby
fall out of sync should a standby fall over.

I'm not sure that anyone is argueing for this..

Looks like here, unless I am really missing the point:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52d07466.6070...@commandprompt.com

"Proposed behavior:

db01->sync->db02

Transactions are happening. Everything is happy. Website is up. Orders are being made.

db02 goes down. It doesn't matter why. It is down. db01 continues to accept orders, allow people to log into the website and we can still service accounts. The continuity of service continues.

Yes, there are all kinds of things that need to be considered when that happens, that isn't the point. The point is, PostgreSQL continues its uptime guarantee and allows the business to continue to function as (if) nothing has happened.

For many and I dare say the majority of businesses, this is enough. They know that if the slave goes down they can continue to operate. They know if the master goes down they can fail over. They know that while both are up they are using sync rep (with various caveats). They are happy. They like that it is simple and just works. They continue to use PostgreSQL. "


B) Create a new mode that does this without changing the existing sync mode.

My two cents would be to implement B. Sync to me is a contract that
master and standby are in sync at any point in time. Anything else
should be called something else. Then it is up to the documentation
to clearly point out the benefits/pitfalls. If you want to implement
something as important as replication without reading the docs then
the results are on you.

The issue is that there are folks who are argueing, essentially, that
"B" is worthless, wrong, and no one should want it and therefore we
shouldn't have it.

Well you will not please everyone, just displease the least.


        Thanks,

                Stephen



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@gmail.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to