On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:58 AM, KONDO Mitsumasa <[email protected]> wrote: > > In my past patch, it is significant bug which is mistaken caluculation of > offset in posix_fadvise():-( However it works well without problem in > pgbench. > Because pgbench transactions are always random access...
Did you notice any difference? AFAIK, when specifying read patterns (ie, RANDOM, SEQUENTIAL and stuff like that), the offset doesn't matter. At least in linux. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
