On 08-11-2013 06:20, Dilip kumar wrote:
> On 08 November 2013 13:38, Jan Lentfer
>> For this use case, would it make sense to queue work (tables) in order of 
>> their size, starting on the largest one?
>> For the case where you have tables of varying size this would lead to a 
>> reduced overall processing time as it prevents large (read: long processing 
>> time) tables to be processed in the last step. While processing large tables 
>> at first and filling up "processing slots/jobs" when they get free with 
>> smaller tables one after the other would safe overall execution time.
> Good point, I have made the change and attached the modified patch.
Don't you submit it for a CF, do you? Is it too late for this CF?

   Euler Taveira                   Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
   PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to