On 16 January 2014 17:22, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-01-16 11:19:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> > I think the usecases that would want this for DML probably also wan this >> > to work for unlogged, temp tables. >> >> Huh? Unlogged tables generate *zero* WAL, by definition. > > Yes. That's my point. If we provide it as a generic resource control - > which what's being discussed here sounds to me - it should be generic. > > If we provide as a measure to prevent standbys from getting out of date > due to maintenance commands, then it only needs to cover those.
Agreed, but it won't happen in this release. I/O resource control to follow in later releases. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
