Hi, On 2014-01-17 14:01:56 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Is there any real use-case for not setting wal_buffers to -1 these days? > > Or should we just remove it and use the -1 behaviour at all times?
I have seen improvements by setting it larger than the max -1 one value. Also, for some workloads (low latency) it can be beneficial to have a small s_b but still have a larger wal_buffers setting. So -1 for removing it from me. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
