On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > >> I don't think we want a branch for 7.4 yet. We still have lots of open > > >> issues and the branch will require double-patching. > > > > > Merge the changes on the 7.3 branch into the 7.4 branch after 7.3 is > > > released. > > > > Why is that better than the other direction? > > > > We can't afford to allow much divergence between the two branches so > > long as we are engaged in wholesale double-patching, so I think it > > really comes down to the same thing in the end: we are not ready for 7.4 > > development to start in earnest, whether there's a CVS branch for it or > > not. > > Yes. We need a decision now because I don't know which branch to touch. > Marc, I need your feedback on these ideas. There is discussion about > fixing earthdistance. Perhaps we fix that and remove the 7.3 tag and > just have everyone CVS checkout again.
Go with Peter's suggestion about committing on one of the branches (v7.3 or v7.4, doesn't matter, unless Peter knows something I don't insofar as merging from branch->trunk vs trunk->branch?) ... then when we are ready to start letting it all diverge, we can just re-sync the opposite branch and keep on with development ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
