Jeremy Harris <j...@wizmail.org> writes:
> In ordered_set_startup() sorts are initialised in non-randomAccess mode
> (tuplesort_begin_heap() and ~datum(), last argument).
> The use of tuplesort_skip_tuples() feels very like a random access to
> me. I think it doesn't fail because the only use (and implementation)
> is to skip forwards; if backwards were tried (as the interface permits)
> external sorts would fail because multiple tapes are present for
Well, we certainly don't want to incur the overhead of randomAccess mode
when we're not actually going to use it, so I'd resist changing the code
It's true that if tuplesort_skip_tuples() supported backwards skip, it
would need to insist that randomAccess mode be enabled *when a backwards
skip is used*. But such a feature is purely hypothetical ATM.
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: