On 28 January 2014 21:56, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-01-28 21:48:09 +0000, Thom Brown wrote: >> On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> I've rebased it here and am hacking on it still. >> > >> > Andres and I are going back and forth between our respective git repos >> > hacking on this, and I think we're getting there, but I have a >> > terminological question which I'd like to submit to a wider audience: >> > >> > The point of Andres's patch set is to introduce a new technology >> > called logical decoding; that is, the ability to get a replication >> > stream that is based on changes to tuples rather than changes to >> > blocks. It could also be called logical replication. In these >> > patches, our existing replication is referred to as "physical" >> > replication, which sounds kind of funny to me. Anyone have another >> > suggestion? >> >> Logical and Binary replication? > > Unfortunately changeset extraction output's can be binary data...
"system"? "cluster"? "full"? "complete"? -- Thom -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
