Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Robert Haas escribió: >> I don't have any comment on that specific point, but I took a quick >> look through one of these diffs and it looks like a lot of churn for >> no improvement. So I'm not sure what we want to do here, but I don't >> think it's this.
> I, on the contrary, think that the cases that are preceded by a period > are an improvement, and the rest are not (the opposite, actually, so > better not change those). Maybe there are specific cases in which a > period-tab sequence should be kept, but that seems rarer. I concur with Alvaro; the only cases I want to see changed are period followed by a tab that would be exactly two spaces. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers