Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Never mind! I just stumbled over those lines in selfuncs.c where
> indexCorrelation is calculated by dividing the correlation of the
> first index column by the number of index columns.
Yeah, I concluded later that that was bogus. I've been thinking of
just using the correlation of the first index column and ignoring
the rest; that would not be great, but it's probably better than what's
there. Have you got a better formula?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
