On 7 February 2014 19:35, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 0004: wal_decoding: Documentation for replication slots and changeset
> extraction
The usage of pg_create_decoding_replication_slot does show the "(1 row)" line.
The output of "SELECT * FROM pg_replication_slots;" is out-of-date.
There appears to be a column named "slot_name" and "slottype". Could
one of these have or not have the underscore for consistency?
The example also shows output from pg_decoding_slot_get_changes after
inserting 2 rows, but when I run the same example, there are no rows
returned:
# BEGIN;
BEGIN
*# INSERT INTO data(data) VALUES('1');
INSERT 0 1
*# INSERT INTO data(data) VALUES('1');
INSERT 0 1
*# COMMIT;
COMMIT
# SELECT * FROM pg_decoding_slot_get_changes('regression_slot', 'now',
'include-xids', '0');
location | xid | data
----------+-----+------
(0 rows)
I inserted a single row outside of a transaction, and got the expected
output. Then I ran the above again, and got an output, but an
unexpected one:
SELECT * FROM pg_decoding_slot_get_changes('regression_slot', 'now',
'include-xids', '0');
location | xid | data
-----------+-----+-----------------------------------------------
0/16C8B90 | 769 | BEGIN
0/16C8D50 | 769 | table "data": INSERT: id[int4]:3 data[text]:1
0/16C8D50 | 769 | COMMIT
(3 rows)
And running the transaction with inserts again, there's no output from
that same function command. I always get an output from isolated
INSERT statements. I should point out that in my .psqlrc file I have
"\set ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK". If I use psql -X, this symptom no longer
occurs, so I think the automatic savepoints are interfering, and the
effect appears to be inconsistent.
--
Thom
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
