On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > This is not only place that worry me about planning overhead. See
> > get_cheapest_fractional_path_for_pathkeys. I had to estimate number of
> > groups for each sorting column in order to get right fractional path.
> AFAICT this only happens once per plan and the overhead is O(n) to the
> number of pathkeys? I can't get worried about that, but I guess it's
> better to test anyway.
> PS: You didn't answer my questions about splitting the patch. I guess
> I'll have to do that anyway to run the tests.

Done. Patch is splitted.

With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

Attachment: partial-sort-basic-1.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Attachment: partial-sort-merge-1.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to