Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> > On 2/15/14, 10:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Yes it does; people who fail to remove their manual externs will get
> >> Windows-only build failures (or at least warnings; it's not very clear
> >> which declaration will win).
> 
> > The manual externs and the automatically provided ones are exactly the
> > same.  Why would that fail?
> 
> Maybe I'm remembering the wrong patch.  I thought what this patch was
> intending was to put PGDLLEXPORT into the automatically-provided externs.

This hunk is the essence of this patch:

 #define PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(funcname) \                                        
                                                                                
                                                                             
+Datum funcname(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS); \                                            
                                                                                
                                                                             
 extern PGDLLEXPORT const Pg_finfo_record * 
CppConcat(pg_finfo_,funcname)(void); \                                          
                                                                                
                                 


Note that PGDLLEXPORT is already there.  This patch is just about
additionally providing the prototype.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to