On 2014-02-16 21:26:47 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I don't think anyone objected to increasing the defaults for work_mem > and maintenance_work_mem by 4x, and a number of people were in favor, > so I think we should go ahead and do that. If you'd like to do the > honors, by all means!
Actually, I object to increasing work_mem by default. In my experience most of the untuned servers are backing some kind of web application and often run with far too many connections. Increasing work_mem for those is dangerous. > I don't really know about cpu_tuple_cost. Kevin's often advocated > raising it, but I haven't heard anyone else advocate for that. I > think we need data points from more people to know whether or not > that's a good idea in general. FWIW It's a good idea in my experience. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers