On 2014-02-17 10:44:41 +0100, Christian Kruse wrote: > This is true for now. But one of the purposes of using > LocalPgBackendStatus instead of PgBackendStatus was to be able to add > more fields like this in future. And thus we might need to change this > in future, so why not do it now?
I don't think that argument is particularly valid. All (?) the other functions just return just one value, so they won't ever have the need to return more. Not really sure which way is better. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers