Haribabu Kommi <[email protected]> writes:
> I want to propose a new feature called "priority table" or "cache table".
> This is same as regular table except the pages of these tables are having
> high priority than normal tables. These tables are very useful, where a
> faster query processing on some particular tables is expected.
Why exactly does the existing LRU behavior of shared buffers not do
what you need?
I am really dubious that letting DBAs manage buffers is going to be
an improvement over automatic management.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
