On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 for back-patching. > Back-patching would be interesting for existing applications, but -1 > as it is a new feature :)
I think that it rises to the level of an omission in 9.3 that now requires correction. Many of our users couldn't run pg_controldata even if they'd heard of it... -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
