On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 for back-patching.
> Back-patching would be interesting for existing applications, but -1
> as it is a new feature :)

I think that it rises to the level of an omission in 9.3 that now
requires correction. Many of our users couldn't run pg_controldata
even if they'd heard of it...

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to