On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:15:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Over in
> there's a complaint about getting "stack depth limit exceeded" from a
> query of the form
> select count(*) from gui_die_summary where (x_coord, y_coord) in
> ((25,5),(41,13),(25,7),(28,3),(25,8),(34,7),(26,6),(21,10), ...);
> when there's a few thousand pairs in the IN list. The reason for this
> is that transformAExprIn() generates a tree of nested OR expressions,
> and then recursion in assign_collations_walker() runs out of stack space.
> Really if we wanted to fix
> this issue we'd need to hack up transformAExprAnd/transformAExprOr so that
> they recognized nested ANDs/ORs and flattened them on the spot. This
> might not be a bad idea, but it's starting to look like more than a quick
> hack patch.
Reminds me of this work:
> Does this seem worth pursuing, or shall we leave it alone?
+1 for fixing. Extrapolating from your figure of 20s and 20 GiB for a million
coordinate pairs, we'd have tolerable performance at 20000 pairs instead of
just failing as we do today. That's a nice win all by itself.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: