> > I'd give you the first and third of those. As Andrew noted, the > > argument that "it's more standard-compliant" is not very solid. > > The standard doesn't say anything about transaction in this regard.
Yes, it sais statement. Note also, that a typical SELECT only session would not advance CURRENT_TIMESTAMP at all in the typical "autocommit off" mode that the Spec is all about. > What do others think? I liked your proposal to advance CURRENT_TIMESTAMP at each statement start. (It would not advance inside a stored procedure). Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
