* Peter Geoghegan ([email protected]) wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not advocating authoring two extensions. I am tentatively > > suggesting that we look at one extension for everything. That may well > > be the least worst thing. > > (Not that it's clear that you imagined I was, but I note it all the same).
Thanks for that clarification- it was useful (for me anyway). For my
2c, while I agree that it would work, I'd still rather see this get into
core for reasons mentioned elsewhere but which I'll echo here- JSON has
become the de-facto data interexchange format on a rather massive scale-
it's become what XML was trying to be, in many ways by being simpler.
While I agree that the comparison to FTS isn't entirely fair, I also
feel that we should still be considering adding new types to core and
not try to push everything out as extensions. To add on to that- I feel
we still have a ways to go before our extension support will be really
*good* (which I certainly hope it to be some day) and I'd rather we not
force that on to the mobs of installations out there who will want
jsonb.
Thanks again,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
