2014-03-05 5:52 GMT+09:00 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>:
> * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
>> > Alright- so do you feel that the simple ctidscan use-case is a
>> > sufficient justification and example of how this can be generally
>> > useful that we should be adding these hooks to core..?  I'm willing to
>> > work through the patch and clean it up this weekend if we agree that
>> > it's useful and unlikely to immediately be broken by expected changes..
>> Yeah, I think it's useful.  But based on Tom's concurrently-posted
>> review, I think there's probably a good deal of work left here.
> Yeah, it certainly looks like it.
> KaiGai- will you have time to go over and address Tom's concerns..?
Yes, I need to do. Let me take it through the later half of this week and
the weekend. So, I'd like to submit revised one by next Monday.

KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp>

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to