2014-03-05 5:52 GMT+09:00 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: >> > Alright- so do you feel that the simple ctidscan use-case is a >> > sufficient justification and example of how this can be generally >> > useful that we should be adding these hooks to core..? I'm willing to >> > work through the patch and clean it up this weekend if we agree that >> > it's useful and unlikely to immediately be broken by expected changes.. >> >> Yeah, I think it's useful. But based on Tom's concurrently-posted >> review, I think there's probably a good deal of work left here. > > Yeah, it certainly looks like it. > > KaiGai- will you have time to go over and address Tom's concerns..? > Yes, I need to do. Let me take it through the later half of this week and the weekend. So, I'd like to submit revised one by next Monday.
Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers