On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > [ shrug... ] They can see whether the Window plan node is where the time > is going. It's not apparent to me that the extra numbers you propose to > report will edify anybody.
Perhaps just saying "Incremental Window Function" versus "Iterated Window Function" or something like that be sufficient? At least that way query tuning quidelines have a keyword they can say to watch out for. And someone trying to figure out *why* the time is being spent in this node has something they might notice a correlation with. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
