On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I think this isn't a good design.  Per the discussion between Andres
> and I, I think that I think you should do is make ALTER TABLE .. SET
> LOGGED work just like VACUUM FULL, with the exception that it will set
> a different relpersistence for the new relfilenode.  If you do it that
> way, this will be less efficient, but much simpler, and you might
> actually finish it in one summer.
>

Do it like 'VACUUM FULL' for any wal_level?

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello

Reply via email to