On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:07:21PM -0500, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a performance patch, so it should come with benchmark results
> demonstrating that it accomplishes its intended purpose. I don't see
> Yes, this is a performance patch, but as the subject says, it saves a few
> instructions. I don't know how to write a test case that can measure savings
> skipping a few instructions in a startup sequence that potentially takes
> thousands, or even millions, of instructions.
Are we saying we don't want this patch?
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
+ Everyone has their own god. +
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: