Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Are you claiming there are no users, and if so, on what evidence?
> I am claiming that I don't think anybody is using that, yes. > Based on the fact that I have *never* come across it on any system I've > come across since, well, forever. Except once I think, many years ago, when > someone had enabled it by mistake and needed my help to remove it... A slightly more scientific basis for that would be to ask on pgsql-general. > Or if someone wants to fix it properly of course :) Yeah, that's what we've been hoping for for 12 years. I stopped holding my breath awhile ago. Mind you, I wouldn't be unhappy to see it go away; it's a kluge and always has been. I'm just expecting lots of push-back if we try. And it's kind of hard to resist push-back when you don't have a substitute to offer. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers