On 2014-03-13 11:20:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > At the same time, I > don't feel compelled to provide an autoload mechanism to cover the > case where a user tries to set a label in a session which does not > have the label provider preloaded.
I don't think there's that much need for that to be supported for user initiated setting, but pg_dump imo is a different case. > Such a mechanism will be complex > and introduce many problems of its own for what is in my mind a pretty > darn narrow benefit; and we sure as heck do not have time to engineer > it for 9.4. Yea, I think that's pretty clearly out of scope for 9.4, independent of the solution we can come up with. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
