On 14 March 2014 11:10, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2014-03-14 12:02 GMT+01:00 Marko Tiikkaja <ma...@joh.to>: > >> On 3/14/14 10:56 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >>> >>> The patch looks fine, apart from some non-guideline code formatting >>> issues. >> >> >> I'm not sure what you're referring to. I thought it looked fine. >> >> >>> Having looked at gcc and clang, I have a proposal for naming/API >>> >>> We just have two variables >>> >>> plpgsql.compile_warnings = 'list' default = 'none' > > > +1 > >>> >>> plpgsql.compile_errors = 'list' default = 'none' >>> >>> Only possible values in 9.4 are 'shadow', 'all', 'none' > > > what is compile_errors ? We don't allow to ignore any error now.
How about plpgsql.additional_warnings = 'list' plpgsql.additional_errors = 'list' -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
