On 14.3.2014 20:18, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 03/14/2014 04:52 AM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> VODKA index will have no lenght limitation. > > Yeah, so I think we go with what we have, and tell people "if you're > hitting these length issues, wait for 9.5, where they will be > fixed."
VODKA may be great, but I haven't seen a single line of code for that yet. And given the response from Oleg, 9.5 seems ambitious. I'm not awfully familiar with the GIN code, but based on Alexander's feedback I presume fixing the GIN length limit (or rather removing it, as it's a feature, not a bug) is quite straightforward. Why not to at least consider that for 9.4, unless it turns more complex than expected? Don't get me wrong - I'm aware it's quite late in the last commitfest, and if it's deemed unacceptable / endandering 9.4 release, I'm not going to say a word. But if it's a simple patch ... regards Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
