On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 22:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, if you want to consider python 2.3 as supported, I have a buildfarm > machine I am about to put online that has 2.3 on it. If I spin it up with > python enabled, I expect you to see to it that it starts passing. If you > won't do that, I'm going to change the documentation.
As I said, according to my testing, 2.3 is supported. If your experience is different, then please submit a reproducible bug report. > As for 2.4 vs 2.5, I don't have a lot of faith that we're really > supporting anything that's not represented in the buildfarm... There are many other features that the build farm doesn't test and that I don't have a lot of faith in, but I'm not proposing to remove those. I don't control what the build farm tests, I only control my own work. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
