Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Meh. I think you're putting a bit too much faith in your ability to >> predict the locus of bugs that you think aren't there.
> Well, I'm open to suggestions. As a suggestion: it'd be worth explicitly testing zero-byte and one-byte messages, those being obvious edge cases. Then, say, randomly chosen lengths in the range 100-1000; this would help ferret out odd-length issues. And something with message sizes larger than the queue size. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers