Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes: > Yeah, it's a bit silly that each resource manager has to do that on > their own. It would be useful to have a memory context that was > automatically reset between each WAL record. In fact that should > probably be the default memory context you run the WAL redo routines in.
+1 > But even if we do that, I'm not in a hurry to remove rm_startup/cleanup. > They seem generally useful, even if they're not actually used for much > anymore. Agreed; they aren't hurting us and they could be useful. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers