Hello, At Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:34:10 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote > > Agreed. Attached patches do that and I could "recover" the > > database state with following steps, > > Adding new option looks like new feature rather than bug fix. > I'm afraid that the backpatch of such a change to 9.3 or before > is not acceptable.
Me too. But on the other hand it simplly is a relief for the consequence of the behavior of server (altough it was ill operation:), and especially it is needed for at least 9.1 which seems cannot be saved without it. Plus it has utterly no impact on servers' behavior of any corresponding versions. So I hope it is accepted. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
