On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Besides implementation, what the idea was here? For me, it's impossible to > skip any single element, because it's possible for query to include only > this element. If we skip that element, we can't answer corresponding query > no more.
This had something to do with an alternative notion of containment. I wouldn't have stuck with such a radical change without consulting you. I reverted it, and am not going to argue for the idea right now. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
