On 4/1/14, 1:04 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
It strains credulity to think that this
>patch alone would have that effect, but there might be quite a few
>similar improvements that are possible. So I think it would be good
>to consider how far we want to go in this direction and where we think
>we might want to stop. That's not to say, let's not ever do this,
>just, let's think carefully about where we want to end up.
Fair enough.
I agree with the concern, but also have to say that I can't count how many
times I could have used this. A big +1, at least in this case.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect j...@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
