Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-04-03 19:08:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A somewhat more relevant concern is where are we going to keep the state
>> data involved in all this. Since this code is, by definition, going to be
>> called in critical sections, any solution involving internal pallocs is
>> right out.
> We actually already allocate memory in XLogInsert() :(, although only in
> the first XLogInsert() a backend does...
Ouch. I wonder if we should put an Assert(not-in-critical-section)
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: