2014-04-07 11:59 GMT+02:00 Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rast...@huawei.com>:
> On 07 April 2014 12:12, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > >+1 for feature > > Thanks > > > > >-1 for Oracle syntax - it is hardly inconsistent with Postgres > > We can discuss and come out with the syntax based on everyone agreement. > > >Autonomous transactions should be used everywhere - not only in plpgsql > > > > Yes you are right. I am not planning to support only using plpgsql. > Initially we can support this > > Using the standalone SQL-commands and then later we can enhance based on > this infrastructure > > to be used using plpgsql, triggers. > ok long time I though about this feature. I am thinking so this should be fully isolated transaction - it should not be subtransaction, because then you can break database consistency - RI I am happy so someone does this job Regards Pavel > > > *Thanks and Regards,* > > *Kumar Rajeev Rastogi * > > >
