On 2014-04-07 10:45:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Hm. It generally might be interesting to get a few !X86 buildfarms > > running builds with LTO enabled. That might expose some dangerous > > assumptions more easily. > > I strongly suspect that will break stuff all over the place. We can > either get compiler barriers working for real, or we can start > volatile-izing every reference in an LWLock-protected critical > section. Hint: the second one is insane.
You don't have to convince me. The way there is where I am not sure we're agreeing. I didn't break a few months back for x86 on light loads btw. Not that that's saying much. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
