Oh, that's right.  I had forgotten that it wasn't for general PostgreSQL
use.  Since it's a ecpg deal only, I guess I remove my objection.


On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 09:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can we please hold off until bison 1.50 becomes a defacto?
> We don't have a whole lot of choice, unless you prefer releasing a
> broken or crippled ecpg with 7.3.
> In practice this only affects people who pull sources from CVS, anyway.
> If you use a tarball then you'll get prebuilt bison output.
>                       regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to