Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Committed with some additional documentation work. Thanks for > submitting this!
Thank you for committing. I had not thought of using different structure for the index. It works faster with my test case, too. I am sending rebased version of the consistent operator names patch in case you would like to include it to the same release. This is what I wrote about this change before: > That is why I prepared it as a separate patch on top of the others. It is > not only consistency with the range types: <@ and @> symbols used for > containment everywhere except the inet data types, particularly on > the geometric types, arrays; cube, hstore, intaray, ltree extensions. > The patch does not just change the operator names, it leaves the old ones, > adds new operators with GiST support and changes the documentation, like > your commit ba920e1c9182eac55d5f1327ab0d29b721154277 back in 2006. I could > not find why did you leave the inet operators unchanged on that commit, > in the mailing list archives . GiST support will be a promotion for > users to switch to the new operators, if we make this change with it. > > This change will also indirectly deprecate the undocumented non-transparent > btree index support that works sometimes for some of the subnet inclusion > operators . > >  http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14277.1157304...@sss.pgh.pa.us > >  http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/389.1042992...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers