On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:05:49AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Ah, yes, good point. This is going to require backpatching then. I also think so. >> I think it's better to use check like below, just for matter of >> consistency with other place >> if (sock == INVALID_SOCKET) > > Agreed. That is how I have coded the patch. Sorry, I didn't checked the latest patch before that comment. I verified that your last patch is fine. Regression test also went fine. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
