On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:05:49AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:

> Ah, yes, good point.  This is going to require backpatching then.

I also think so.

>> I think it's better to use check like below, just for matter of
>> consistency with other place
>> if (sock == INVALID_SOCKET)
> Agreed.  That is how I have coded the patch.

Sorry, I didn't checked the latest patch before that comment.

I verified that your last patch is fine.  Regression test also went fine.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to