Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2002 14:12 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Mario Weilguni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is it possible to get rid of the "t_natts" fields in the tuple header?
> > Is this field only for "alter table add/drop" support?
>
> "Only"? A lot of people consider that pretty important ...
With "only" I mean it's an administrative task which requires operator intervenation
anyways, and it's a seldom needed operation which may take longer, when
queries become faster.
>
> But removing 2 bytes isn't going to save anything, on most machines,
> because of alignment considerations.
ok, I did not consider alignment, but the question remains, is this easily doable?
Especially because only one another byte has to be saved for
real saving on many architectures, which is t_hoff. IMO t_hoff is not useful because
it can be computed easily. This would give 20 byte headers instead of 23 (24) bytes as
it's now.
This is 17% saved, and if it's not too complicated it might be worth to consider.
Best regards,
Mario Weilguni
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
